Tuesday, February 03, 2009

Shuster and Pataki on the Corrupt Libescheme



David Shuster puts George Elmer Fudd Pataki on the spot re Lauder and Libeskind.

The point Pataki and the other Libeskind / Fraud'em Tower shills don't seem to get or don't want to get is that neither Fraud'em Tower nor the Libeskind scheme as a whole is a soaring memorial, as they would have us believe. Every building in the Libescheme is less than what one of the destroyed towers was.








Building
Tip height
Roof height
Floors
Office floors
Square ft

Building
Tip height
Roof height
Floors
Office floors
Square ft

Old 1 WTC
1,728 ft
1,368 ft
110
92
4,300,000

Old 2 WTC
1,377 ft
1,362 ft
110
92
4,300,000

Fraud'em
1,776 ft
1,362 ft
82 to 108
69
2,600,000

New 2 WTC
1,350 ft
1,270 ft
79
60
2,530,000


The only thing in any of the Libescheme buildings that exceeds the old WTC is the spire atop Fraud'em Tower, which beats the communications tower of the old One WTC by all of 48 feet.

Replacing an engineering triumph with a bunch of random office buildings is not a soaring memorial, is not reclaiming the skyline, and is not a good idea.

What part of "Excelsior!" don't you get, Elmer?

No comments: